The Collaborative Learning to Enhance Reflective Writing in English

Authors

  • Nurianti Sitorus Politeknik Negeri Media Kreatif

Keywords:

reflective, writing, learning, collaborative, English

Abstract

Writing is one of the skills in English needed to express someone’s view. However, some students have problem in elaborating their idea or view. As one of the media to communicate, writing is important to study. Unfortunately, writing as an essential skill that all higher education students must master to succeed in their degree and professionally is not an easy thing to learn. It takes practices and techniques. One of the applicable techniques is reflective writing which is also known as journal writing. There are several studies which examined the benefit of doing this, yet the result of this technique combined with another technique is needed to know. The researcher would like to know the result when collaborative learning is mixed with reflective writing. It has been known that collaborative learning inspires students to read, listen, write, and reflect on their work together. In this current study, the researcher wanted to find out (a) the ability of social factors to enhance the journal writing, (b) whether collaborative learning gives impact to student’s perfomance in reflective writing. Data have been gathered through questionnaires from vocational students. Likert scale was employed with scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) to find out how social collaboration helps students do their reflective writing. The findings provide evidence that (1) social factors such as interaction with peers and lectures and social presence positively impact reflective writing, (2) in terms of reflective writing, most of participants focused more on using descriptive words. It has been concluded that overall, collaborative learning engaged well and enhanced the reflective writing. Therefore, their usage must be stimulated in studying English.

References

Abisamra, Nada. 2001. Teaching Writing Approach & Activities. Abisamra, Nada. 2001. Teaching Writing Approach & Activities. (Retrieved on July 2023. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40014588.

Bell, A., Kelton, J., Mcdonagh, N., Mladenovic, R., & Morrison, K. (2011). A critical evaluation of the usefulness of a coding scheme to categorise levels of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(7), 797–815. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.488795

Brown, L. & Lara, V. (2011). Professional Development Module on Collaborative Learning. El Paso Community College, Texas; USA. Retrieved 5 Okt. 2023. from: http://www.texascollaborative.org/Collaborative_Learning_Module.htm

Cho, Y. H., Yim, S. Y., & Paik, S. (2015). Physical and social presence in 3D virtual role-play for pre-service teachers. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.01.002

Daljeet Singh Sedhu, S. Chee Choy, Mun Yee Lee. Students’ Perceptions of Using Collaborative Learning as a Tool for Acquiring Writing Skills in University. American Journal of Applied Psychology. Special Issue: Psychology of University Students. Vol. 4, No. 3-1, 2015, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.s.2015040301.11

Delandshere, G., & Arens, S. A. (2003). Examining the quality of the evidence in preservice teacher portfolios. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 57–73. doi:10.1177/0022487102238658

Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 617-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757

Eric Poldner, Marieke Van der Schaaf, P. Robert-Jan Simons, Jan Van Tartwijk & Guus Wijngaards (2014) Assessing student teachers’ reflective writing through quantitative content analysis, European Journal of Teacher Education, 37:3, 348-373, DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2014.892479

Johnson, M. D. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 13-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001

Gerot, L. and Wignell, P. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Antipodeon educational Enterprises (AEE) Publishing.

Houston, R.C. (2016) Do Scaffolding Tools Improve Reflective Writing in Professional Portfolios? A Content Analysis of Reflective Writing in an Advanced Preparation Program, Action in Teacher Education, 38:4, 399 409, DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2016.1226201.

Jarvis, M. -A., & Baloyi, O. B. (2020). Scaffolding in reflective journaling: A means to develop higher order thinking skills in undergraduate learners. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 12, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100195

Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Lee, S.-M. (2014). The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online

learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.12.002

Leijen, Ä., K. Valtna, D. A. J. Leijen, and M. Pedaste. (2012). “How to Determine the Quality

of Students’ Reflections?” Studies in Higher Education 37: 203–217. doi:10.1080/ 03075079.2010.504814.

McIntosh, K., Connor, U., & Gokpinar-Shelton, E. (2017). What intercultural rhetoric can bring to EAP/ESP writing studies in an English as a lingua franca world? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 29, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.09.001

Ullmann, T.D. (2017). Reflective Writing Analytics - Empirically Determined Keywords of Written Reflection. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3027385

Ullmann, T. D. (2019). Automated Analysis of Reflection in Writing: Validating Machine Learning Approaches. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2019) 29:217–257.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Sitorus, N. (2024). The Collaborative Learning to Enhance Reflective Writing in English. Proceeding International Conference on Religion, Science and Education, 3, 491–495. Retrieved from http://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/view/1045

Issue

Section

Articles