Development of the PTEAM (Physics, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics) Approach by applying the SOLO Taxonomy

Vivi Mardian; Didi Teguh Chandra

Authors

Vivi Mardian Physics Education Department, Physics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Didi Teguh Chandra Physics Education Department, Physics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Keywords:

PTEAM, SOLO Taxonomy, Approach

Abstract

Advances in science and technology cannot be separated from developments in physics. Physics discusses all natural phenomena both abstract and real. One of the right learning approaches to master literacy and numeracy skills is PTEAM. PTEAM stands for Physics, Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics. PTEAM can be implemented with the SOLO taxonomy. SOLO stands for Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome. There are five levels in the SOLO taxonomy namely SOLO 1 (pre-structural level), SOLO 2 (uni-structural level), SOLO 3 (multi-structural level), SOLO 4 (relational level), and SOLO 5 (extended abstract level). The PTEAM approach is a form of real implementation of the independent curriculum. PTEAM's main goal is to improve students' literacy and numeracy skills by applying engineering and technology themes to build the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. PTEAM's learning innovations involve parents, teachers and the community.

References

Abdul, Fahri. (2022). Memahami Pengertian Literasi, Tujuan, Jenis, & Contohnya. Ruang Guru. Diakses pada 19 Nomber 2022. Memahami Pengertian Literasi, Tujuan, Jenis & Contohnya (ruangguru.com)

Ayuningtyas, N., & Sukriyah, D. (2020). Analisis pengetahuan numerasi mahasiswa matematika calon guru. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2).

Biggs, J. B & Collis, K. F., (1982). Evaluating The Quality of Learning the SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: Academic Press.

Brabrand, C., & Dahl, B. (2009). Using the SOLO taxonomy to analyze competence progression of university science curricula. Higher Education, 58(4), 531-549.

Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2011). Improving numeracy education in rural schools: A professional development approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(2), 129-148.