Investigating The Cognitive Level of English Test Developed by English Teacher
Keywords:
Cognitive Level, English TestAbstract
This study deals with investigating the English test randomly in senior high school. There are five randomly questions of English test of 10th grade in 2021/2022 academic year. Documentation is the main instrument of this study. The result of this study shows that the percentage of cognitive levels of English test of 10th grade in 2021/2022 academic year that there are 60% of remembering (C1), 40% understanding (C2), meanwhile applying (C3), analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5) and creating (C6) are 0%. In addition, the results obtained percentage of LOTS, MOTS, and HOTS of English test question as follow there are 60% of questions that are categorized as LOTS, 40% of questions are categorized into MOTS, and 0% of questions are categorized into HOTS. Therefore, the quality of the English randomly is categorized remembering (C1) or LOTS level.
References
Ali, S. H., & Ruit, K. G. (2015). The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(5), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0212-x
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (n.d.). BRIDGED EDITIO A FOIt , AND EDITORS.
Archer, E. (2017). The Assessment Purpose Triangle: Balancing the Purposes of Educational Assessment. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 2). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00041
Cheng, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, H., Cai, Z., Wu, G., & Huang, J. (2021). A Cognitive Level Evaluation Method Based on a Deep Neural Network for Online Learning: From a Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognition Objectives Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661235
Hamdu, G., Fuadi, F. N., Yulianto, A., & Akhirani, Y. S. (2020). Items Quality Analysis Using Rasch Model To Measure Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skill On Stem Learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.20884
Hartini, P., Setiadi, H., & Ernawati, E. (2021). Cognitive domain analysis (LOTS and HOTS) assessment instruments made by primary school teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.34411
Mehta, G., & Mokhasi, V. (2014). Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions-An Assessment of the Assessment Tool. International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (Www.Ijhsr.Org), 4. www.ijhsr.org
Mohammedid, M., & Omar, N. (2020). Question classification based on Bloom’s taxonomy cognitive domain using modified TF-IDF and word2vec. PLoS ONE, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230442
Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of Primary Leaving English Exam questions in Rwandan schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00156-2
Styvani, P. (2022). An Analysis of Cognitive Levels on Questions Used for Examination in SMP Negeri 15 Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(11), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v11i1.116319
Subia, G. S., Marcos, M. C., Pascual, L. E., Tomas, A. V, & Liangco, M. M. (2020). Cognitive Levels as Measure of Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Senior High School Mathematics of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Graduates (Vol. 62). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342762567
YUMELKING, M. (2019). Cognitive Levels of English Test Items Constructed by EFL Teachers of Senior High Schools . SMCC Higher Education Research Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.18868/sherj6j.06.010119.08
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rezkilaturahmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
