Investigating The Cognitive Level of English Test Developed by English Teacher

Authors

  • Rezkilaturahmi Rezkilaturahmi Educational Research and Evaluation, Graduated School Faculty, Yogyakarta State University

Keywords:

Cognitive Level, English Test

Abstract

This study deals with investigating the English test randomly in senior high school. There are five randomly questions of English test of 10th grade in 2021/2022 academic year. Documentation is the main instrument of this study. The result of this study shows that the percentage of cognitive levels of English test of 10th grade in 2021/2022 academic year that there are 60% of remembering (C1), 40% understanding (C2), meanwhile applying (C3), analyzing (C4), evaluating (C5) and creating (C6) are 0%. In addition, the results obtained percentage of LOTS, MOTS, and HOTS of English test question as follow there are 60% of questions that are categorized as LOTS, 40% of questions are categorized into MOTS, and 0% of questions are categorized into HOTS. Therefore, the quality of the English randomly is categorized remembering (C1) or LOTS level.

References

Ali, S. H., & Ruit, K. G. (2015). The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4(5), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0212-x

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (n.d.). BRIDGED EDITIO A FOIt , AND EDITORS.

Archer, E. (2017). The Assessment Purpose Triangle: Balancing the Purposes of Educational Assessment. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 2). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00041

Cheng, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, H., Cai, Z., Wu, G., & Huang, J. (2021). A Cognitive Level Evaluation Method Based on a Deep Neural Network for Online Learning: From a Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognition Objectives Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661235

Hamdu, G., Fuadi, F. N., Yulianto, A., & Akhirani, Y. S. (2020). Items Quality Analysis Using Rasch Model To Measure Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skill On Stem Learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.20884

Hartini, P., Setiadi, H., & Ernawati, E. (2021). Cognitive domain analysis (LOTS and HOTS) assessment instruments made by primary school teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.34411

Mehta, G., & Mokhasi, V. (2014). Item Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions-An Assessment of the Assessment Tool. International Journal of Health Sciences & Research (Www.Ijhsr.Org), 4. www.ijhsr.org

Mohammedid, M., & Omar, N. (2020). Question classification based on Bloom’s taxonomy cognitive domain using modified TF-IDF and word2vec. PLoS ONE, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230442

Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of Primary Leaving English Exam questions in Rwandan schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-021-00156-2

Styvani, P. (2022). An Analysis of Cognitive Levels on Questions Used for Examination in SMP Negeri 15 Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(11), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v11i1.116319

Subia, G. S., Marcos, M. C., Pascual, L. E., Tomas, A. V, & Liangco, M. M. (2020). Cognitive Levels as Measure of Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Senior High School Mathematics of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Graduates (Vol. 62). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342762567

YUMELKING, M. (2019). Cognitive Levels of English Test Items Constructed by EFL Teachers of Senior High Schools . SMCC Higher Education Research Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.18868/sherj6j.06.010119.08

Downloads

Published

2024-03-05

How to Cite

Rezkilaturahmi, R. (2024). Investigating The Cognitive Level of English Test Developed by English Teacher. Proceeding International Conference on Religion, Science and Education, 3, 35–39. Retrieved from https://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/view/1147

Issue

Section

Articles