Development of Science Literacy-Based Physics Magazine on Vibration and Wave Material for Class VIII SMP/Mts

Sovia Mas Ayu; Asmara Dewi; Isma Oktaviani

Authors

Sovia Mas Ayu Pascasarjana UIN Raden Intan Lampung
Asmara Dewi Pascasarjana UIN Raden Intan Lampung
Isma Oktaviani Pascasarjana UIN Raden Intan Lampung

Keywords:

Development, physics magazine, scientific literacy, vibrations, waves

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) Determine the feasibility of scientific literacy-based physics magazines based on the opinion of the validator (2) Know students' responses to the attractiveness of scientific literacy-based physics magazines. This research is an R&D research that adopts the development from Borg & Gall with stages namely potentials and problems, data collection, product design, design validation, product revision, and product testing. The research subjects involved consisted of experts (material experts and media experts), teachers, and students of class VIII SMP/MTs. The types of data generated are quantitative and qualitative data which are analyzed with the guidelines of the assessment category criteria to determine product quality. The results obtained are: (1) The feasibility of the final product of physics magazine based on scientific literacy based on expert judgment is very feasible, with an average percentage of material expert validation of 90.7%, an average percentage of media experts is 91%, an average percentage -the average percentage of religious experts is 93%, and the average percentage of magazine experts is 93% (2) The response of students to the attractiveness of physics magazines based on scientific literacy as a learning medium obtained in the small group test is good with an average score of 76%. The field test obtained good criteria with an average score of 79%. Science literacy-based physics magazines were declared feasible and received a positive response to be used as learning media.

References

Afandi, Sajidan, Akhyar, M., & Suryani, N. (2019). Development Frameworks of the Indonesian Partnership 21st-Century Skills Standards for Prospective Science Teachers: A Delphi Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647

Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the Problem-Posing Approach on Students’ Problem Solving Skills and Metacognitive Awareness in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7

Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., & Hu, J. (2021). Discrimination of the Contextual Features of Top Performers in Scientific Literacy Using a Machine Learning Approach. Research in Science Education, 51(S1), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9835-y

Chipukuma, H. M., Halwiindi, H., Zulu, J. M., Azizi, S. C., & Jacobs, C. (2020). Evaluating fidelity of community health worker roles in malaria prevention and control programs in Livingstone District, Zambia-A bottleneck analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 612. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05458-1

Granic, A., & Marangunic, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864

Jiang, Z., Wu, H., Cheng, H., Wang, W., Xie, A., & Fitzgerald, S. R. (2021). Twelve tips for teaching medical students online under COVID-19. Medical Education Online, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1854066

Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). 21st Century Skills (pp. 479–496). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_32

Lai, A.-F., Chen, C.-H., & Lee, G.-Y. (2019). An augmented reality-based learning approach to enhancing students’ science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12716

Lederman, N. G. (2019). Contextualizing the Relationship Between Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00030-8

Li, X., & Chu, S. K. W. (2021). Exploring the effects of gamification pedagogy on children’s reading: A mixed-method study on academic performance, reading-related mentality and behaviors, and sustainability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13057

Maree, J. G. (2021). The psychosocial development theory of Erik Erikson: critical overview. Early Child Development and Care, 191(7–8), 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1845163

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Marshall, N. J., Cortesi, F., de Busserolles, F., Siebeck, U. E., & Cheney, K. L. (2019). Colours and colour vision in reef fishes: Past, present and future research directions. Journal of Fish Biology, 95(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13849

Nasar, Z., Jaffry, S. W., & Malik, M. K. (2019). Textual keyword extraction and summarization: State-of-the-art. Information Processing & Management, 56(6), 102088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102088

Nuckles, M., Roelle, J., Glogger-Frey, I., Waldeyer, J., & Renkl, A. (2020). The Self-Regulation-View in Writing-to-Learn: Using Journal Writing to Optimize Cognitive Load in Self-Regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1089–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09541-1

Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2021). The Efficacy of Inquiry-Based Instruction in Science: a Comparative Analysis of Six Countries Using PISA 2015. Research in Science Education, 51(S2), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09901-0

Pasmore, W., Winby, S., Mohrman, S. A., & Vanasse, R. (2019). Reflections: Sociotechnical Systems Design and Organization Change. Journal of Change Management, 19(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2018.1553761

R, N., Rinanto, Y., & Ramli, M. (2019). Scientific literacy profile in biological science of high school students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7080

Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Tuominen, M., & Tirri, K. (2019). In search of a growth mindset pedagogy: A case study of one teacher’s classroom practices in a Finnish elementary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.002

Rogelberg, S. G., King, E. B., & Alonso, A. (2022). How we can bring I-O psychology science and evidence-based practices to the public. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2021.142

Sharon, A. J., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life? Science Education, 104(5), 873-894. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21581

Steffe, L. P., & Ulrich, C. (2020). Constructivist Teaching Experiment. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 134–141). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_32

Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation. Science & Education, 30(3), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2

You, H. S., Park, S., & Delgado, C. (2021). A closer look at US schools: What characteristics are associated with scientific literacy? A multivariate multilevel analysis using PISA 2015. Science Education, 105(2), 406–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21609

Zobrist, J., Sima, M., Dogaru, D., Senila, M., Yang, H., Popescu, C., Roman, C., Bela, A., Frei, L., Dold, B., & Balteanu, D. (2009). Environmental and socioeconomic assessment of impacts by mining activities—a case study in the Certej River catchment, Western Carpathians, Romania. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 16(S1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-008-0068-2