Blended Learning as a Form of Independent Learning for Indonesian Students and its Character Impact

Authors

  • Istiningsih UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Blended learning, Independent learning, IT and Character impact

Abstract

This study aims to investigate how the implementation of a blended learning model can improve competencies of Indonesian students, such as for developing information & technology skill and improving the quality of students’ character, at higher education in Indonesia especially in State Islamic University Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta for faculty of education. Qualitative research methods were applied in this study, with data being collected through questionnaires, field observations, and a literature study. The results indicate that using a blended learning model as a form of independent learning at the faculty of education, State Islamic University Sunan Kalijaga falls into the “good” or “acceptable” category. The impact of the model helped improve the character of students, especially for independence and responsibility mental. Students gained the ability to communicate with lecturers and friends as well as wide knowledge also improve character. When stronger skill of information and technology as well as character are built, the students could build huge network to working world such as industries also institutions where they will work after finishing their studies. The novelty of this research lies in the use of blended learning model, which was developed based on the disruption era also revolution industry 4.0. The hope is that this will help solve the problems in learning process on disruption era in Indonesia. The expected implication is that government and educational institutions will work together to encourage the development of blended learning model as a form independence learning which is as the latest policy from the Indonesian ministry of of education.

References

Alki?, N and Ta?kaya Temizel, T. 2018. The Impact of Motivation and Personality on Academic Performance in Online and Blended Learning Environments. Educational Technology and Society 21 (3): 35–47.
Allen, I and Seaman, J. 2010. Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010. Creative education 5 (10): 1-26.
Barbara Means, Yukie Toyama, Robert Murphy and Marianne Baki. 2013. The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record: The voice of scholarship in education 115 (3): 1-47.
Bloemer, W and Swan, K. 2015. Investigating informal blending at the University of Illinois Springfield. In A. G.
Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, and C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives 2: 52–69.
Charles R. Graham. 2006. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. Pfeiffer - An
Imprint of Wiley, San Francisco.
Charles R. Graham. 2009. Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition. IGI Global, Brigham Young University, USA.
Charles R. Graham, Henrie, CR and Gibbons, AS. 2014. Developing models and theory for blended learning research. BlendedLearning: Research Perspectives (2): 13–33.
Chuck Dziuban and Moskal, P. 2011. A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education 14 (4): 236–241.
Chuck Dziuban., Hartman, JL, Thomas B Cavanagh and Patsy D Moskal. 2011. Blended courses as drivers of institutional transformation. Blended learning across disciplines: Models for implementation. IGI Global, United States of America.
Chuck Dziuban, Charles R. Graham, and Patsy D. Moskal. 2018. Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15 (3): 1-16.
Daniels, HL and Moore, DM. 2000. Interaction of cognitive style and learner control in a hypermedia environment. International Journal of Instructional Media 27 (4): 369-384.
Dringus, LP., and AB Seagull. 2015. A five-year study of sustaining blended learning initiatives to enhance academic engagement in computer and information sciences campus courses. In Blended learning: Research perspectives (2): 122-140.
D. Randy Garrison, D. R and Norman D. Vaughan. 2008. Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Nacada, Kansas State University.
Garrison, D. R and Kanuka, H. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and HigherEducation (7): 95–105.
Hall, H and Davison, B. 2007. Social software as support in hybrid learning environments: The value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support. Library & Information Science Research 29 (2): 163–187.
Heather Staker and Michael B. Horn. 2012. Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute.
John Watson. 2008. Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. North American Council for Online Learning, American.
John Wiley and Sons. Graham, C. R. 2006. Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends and future directions. In: Bonk, C.J. and Graham, C.R., Eds., Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco.
Khoirunnisa and Ida Dwi Safitri. 2018. Reading Habits and Its Effect on Academic Writing Skill:A Study of Master Degree Students. JELE: Journal of English Language and Education 4 (1): 43-50.
Miles, Mattew B, Huberman, Michael A and Saldana, Jhonny. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Eds. Helen Salmon, Kaitlin Perry, Kalie Koscielak, and Laura Barrent. SAGE Publication, Los Angeles.
Moleong LJ. 2013. Qualitative Research Methodology Revised Edition. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset Publisher, Bandung.
Nguyen N., Allen, LC and Fraccastoro, K. 2005. Personality predicts academic performance: Exploring the moderating role of gender. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (1): 105-117.
Nicky Hockly. 2018. Blended Learning. ELT Journal 72 (1): 97–101.
Noftle EE and Robins, RW. 2007. Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big Five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of personality and social psychology 93 (1): 116-130.
Olapiriyakul K and Scher, JM. 2006. A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study. The Internet and Higher Education 9 (4): 287-301.
Patsy Moskal, Charles Dziuban and Joel Hartman. 2013. Blended learning: A dangerous idea?. Internet and Higher Education (18): 15-23.
Picciano AG. 2009. Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13 (1): 7-18.
Poropat AE. 2009. A Meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological bulletin 135 (2): 322-338.
Rovai AP and Jordan, HM. 2004. Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 5 (2): 1-13.
Stefan Hrastinski. 2019. What Do We Mean by Blended Learning?. TechTrends (63): 564–569.
Tynan B, Ryan Y and Lamont-Mills, A. 2015. Examining workload models in online and blended teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (1): 5-15.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-22

How to Cite

Istiningsih. (2022). Blended Learning as a Form of Independent Learning for Indonesian Students and its Character Impact. Proceeding International Conference on Religion, Science and Education, 1, 235–240. Retrieved from https://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/view/797

Issue

Section

Articles